Ramsey v. Stansberry

258 F. App'x 607
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2007·No. No. 07-7168·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richard Joseph Ramsey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and subsequent Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ramsey v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02187-D (E.D.N.C. July 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramsey v. Stansberry, 258 F. App'x 607 (4th Cir. 2007).

258 F. App'x 607 (Ramsey v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241