Ramsey v. Shannon
This text of 41 S.W. 732 (Ramsey v. Shannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this cause a motion has been filed by respondent to dismiss the appeal taken herein. This is an equitable proceeding, having for its object the redemption of land sold for the payment of taxes, plaintiff not having been made a party defendant to the suit to enforce the State’s lien for such taxes. The circuit court allowed her to redeem, and from the decree in plaintiff’s favor defendant appeals.
Consolidated rules 15 and 16 of this court require that appellant file “an abstract or abridgment of the record setting forth so much thereof as is necessary to a full understanding of all the questions presented to this court for decision.”
The obvious object of these rules is that no reference to the record need be made, but that the court [282]*282may rely for its information on the abstract alone. No attempt has been made in this cause to comply with these rules, and consequently the motion filed by plaintiff must prevail. Rule 19, Sup. Ct. Rules; Jayne v. Wine, 98 Mo. 404.
Therefore appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 S.W. 732, 140 Mo. 281, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-shannon-mo-1897.