Ramsey v. Randall

Indiana Supreme Court

Ramsey v. Randall

43 Ind. 549

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1873

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 43 Ind. 549 (Ramsey v. Randall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramsey v. Randall, 43 Ind. 549 (Ind. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Downey, C. J.

There are no questions presented by the assignment of errors in this case, except such as should have been stated as reasons for a new trial. The overruling of the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error. The case is like the case of Cole v. Burris, 38 Ind. 168; and for the reasons there stated the judgment must be affirmed. See Tyner v. Adams, 34 Ind. 401.

Judgment affirmed, with five' per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Downey, C. J.

There are no questions presented by the assignment of errors in this case, except such as should have been stated as reasons for a new trial. The overruling of the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error. The case is like the case of Cole v. Burris, 38 Ind. 168; and for the reasons there stated the judgment must be affirmed. See Tyner v. Adams, 34 Ind. 401.

Judgment affirmed, with five' per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 Ind. 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-randall-ind-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack