Ramsey v. Randall

Indiana Supreme Court

Ramsey v. Randall

43 Ind. 549

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Downey, C. J.

There are no questions presented by the assignment of errors in this case, except such as should have been stated as reasons for a new trial. The overruling of the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error. The case is like the case of Cole v. Burris, 38 Ind. 168; and for the reasons there stated the judgment must be affirmed. See Tyner v. Adams, 34 Ind. 401.

Judgment affirmed, with five' per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Downey, C. J.

There are no questions presented by the assignment of errors in this case, except such as should have been stated as reasons for a new trial. The overruling of the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error. The case is like the case of Cole v. Burris, 38 Ind. 168; and for the reasons there stated the judgment must be affirmed. See Tyner v. Adams, 34 Ind. 401.

Judgment affirmed, with five' per cent, damages and costs.

Ramsey v. Randall, 43 Ind. 549 (Ind. 1873).

Pincite

43 Ind. 549 (Ramsey v. Randall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related