Ramsey v. New York

440 U.S. 444, 99 S. Ct. 1415, 59 L. Ed. 2d 440, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 70
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 23, 1979
Docket77-6540
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 440 U.S. 444 (Ramsey v. New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramsey v. New York, 440 U.S. 444, 99 S. Ct. 1415, 59 L. Ed. 2d 440, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 70 (1979).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for certiorari in this case stated the question presented as follows:

“Whether a guilty plea is obtained in violation of due process of law when it is induced by a judge’s threat that, should the defendant be convicted after trial, he will receive a sentence almost four times greater than one once seriously discussed, and more than twice as great as the one then held out as part of a plea offer.”

We granted certiorari to decide this question. 439 U. S. 892. After briefing and oral argument, it has become evident that on the record in this case it cannot be said with any degree of certainty that this question is actually presented. The writ, therefore, is dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Consaul
982 S.W.2d 899 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Alf Key v. Mrs. Louise P. Wise
629 F.2d 1049 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
440 U.S. 444, 99 S. Ct. 1415, 59 L. Ed. 2d 440, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-new-york-scotus-1979.