Ramsey v. King
This text of 1908 OK 3 (Ramsey v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This proceeding was submitted to the court upon the same response and agreed statement of facts as the case of Toney Matney v. John H. King, Judge of the District Court of Muskogee County, State of Oklahoma, reported in this volume, 93 Pac. 737; the only difference in the eases being that the relator in the Matney Case sought, by mandamus, to be recognized as clerk of the district court, and in this case the relator seeks recognition as sheriff of Muskogee county. Both relators being officers of the court, the same rule will apply in both cases. On the authority of the Matney Case, let a peremptory writ of mandamus issue commanding the respondent as judge of the district court of Muskogee county, state of Oklahoma, to recognize the relator as sheriff of said county and state, and to permit said relator to do and perform all the duties which, under the law, he is required to do and perform as sheriff of said county and state.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1908 OK 3, 93 P. 754, 20 Okla. 67, 1907 Okla. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-king-okla-1908.