Ramsey v. King

1908 OK 3, 93 P. 754, 20 Okla. 67, 1907 Okla. LEXIS 13
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 15, 1908·No. 7·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Kane, J.:

This proceeding was submitted to the court upon the same response and agreed statement of facts as the case of Toney Matney v. John H. King, Judge of the District Court of Muskogee County, State of Oklahoma, reported in this volume, 93 Pac. 737; the only difference in the eases being that the relator in the Matney Case sought, by mandamus, to be recognized as clerk of the district court, and in this case the relator seeks recognition as sheriff of Muskogee county. Both relators being officers of the court, the same rule will apply in both cases. On the authority of the Matney Case, let a peremptory writ of mandamus issue commanding the respondent as judge of the district court of Muskogee county, state of Oklahoma, to recognize the relator as sheriff of said county and state, and to permit said relator to do and perform all the duties which, under the law, he is required to do and perform as sheriff of said county and state.

It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramsey v. King, 1908 OK 3, 93 P. 754, 20 Okla. 67, 1907 Okla. LEXIS 13 (Okla. 1908).

1908 OK 3 (Ramsey v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Petuskey v. Cannon
1987 OK 74 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1987)
Matney v. King
1908 OK 1 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)