Ramsey v. Gibson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ramsey v. Gibson

185 S.W. 1025, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 563

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 11, 1916

DocketNo. 1643.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 185 S.W. 1025 (Ramsey v. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramsey v. Gibson, 185 S.W. 1025, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 563 (Tex. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

WILLSON, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above).

[1-3] It is apparent from the statement above that there was testimony amply sufficient to support the findings made by the jury; and it is further apparent that the findings warranted the judgment rendered. The court did not err, we think, in refusing-to instruct the jury as to the meaning of the phrase “efficient or procuring cause.” The words are not technical, are in common use, and presumably their meaning was as accurately known to the jury as to the court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILLSON, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above).

[1-3] It is apparent from the statement above that there was testimony amply sufficient to support the findings made by the jury; and it is further apparent that the findings warranted the judgment rendered. The court did not err, we think, in refusing-to instruct the jury as to the meaning of the phrase “efficient or procuring cause.” The words are not technical, are in common use, and presumably their meaning was as accurately known to the jury as to the court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 S.W. 1025, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-gibson-texapp-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack