Ramsey v. Gibson

185 S.W. 1025, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 563
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 11, 1916·No. No. 1643.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

WILLSON, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above).

[1-3] It is apparent from the statement above that there was testimony amply sufficient to support the findings made by the jury; and it is further apparent that the findings warranted the judgment rendered. The court did not err, we think, in refusing-to instruct the jury as to the meaning of the phrase “efficient or procuring cause.” The words are not technical, are in common use, and presumably their meaning was as accurately known to the jury as to the court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramsey v. Gibson, 185 S.W. 1025, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 563 (Tex. Ct. App. 1916).

185 S.W. 1025 (Ramsey v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First Nat. Bank in Dallas v. Smith
141 S.W.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1940)
St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Lowry
119 S.W.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Lumsden v. Jones
227 S.W. 358 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1921)