Ramsey v. Farmers New World Life Insurance Company
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PATROCINA A. RAMSEY, Case No. 1:19-cv-00405-LHR-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND DIRECTING CLERK v. OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET TO REFLECT INSURANCE COMPANY, (ECF Nos. 82, 83) Defendant. On July 7, 2025, the Court issued an order to show cause, requiring the parties to show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file dispositional documents by the court ordered deadline. (ECF No. 82.) On July 14, 2025, Plaintiff timely filed a declaration responding to the order to show cause (ECF No. 83-1), along with a stipulation of dismissal. (ECF No. 83.) Satisfied with the responses from Plaintiff, the Court will therefore discharge the order to show cause and direct the Clerk to close this case. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. The July 7, 2025 order to show cause is DISCHARGED. (ECF No. 82.); and 2. In light of the stipulation (ECF No. 83), this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is hereby DIRECTED to close the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). ps s0 ORDERED DAM Le Dated: _ July 15, 2025 STANLEY A. BOONE United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramsey v. Farmers New World Life Insurance Company (Ramsey v. Farmers New World Life Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.