Ramsey v. Evans

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ramsey v. Evans

228 S.W. 356, 1921 Tex. App. LEXIS 741

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 16, 1921

DocketNo. 6508.

StatusPublished

This text of 228 S.W. 356 (Ramsey v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramsey v. Evans, 228 S.W. 356, 1921 Tex. App. LEXIS 741 (Tex. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

*357 COBBS, J.

We overruled defendant in-error’s motion to dismiss this appeal, because we were satisfied that plaintiff in error filed his brief in ample time before the cause was submitted for it to-have been answered. Defendant in error filed no brief.

There were no new or important questions presented by assignment, nor any authorities cited in support of any of them.

We have read and considered the brief filed by plaintiff in error, and the supposed errors assigned.

This is a fact case. The issues were submitted to the jury, and they found for defendant in error. As we believe substantial justice has been obtained, we do not feel inclined to disturb the judgment and send the case back for another trial. Whitaker v. McCarty (Com. App.) 221 S. W. 572.

There is no reversible error assigned, and the assignments are all overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*357 COBBS, J.

We overruled defendant in-error’s motion to dismiss this appeal, because we were satisfied that plaintiff in error filed his brief in ample time before the cause was submitted for it to-have been answered. Defendant in error filed no brief.

There were no new or important questions presented by assignment, nor any authorities cited in support of any of them.

We have read and considered the brief filed by plaintiff in error, and the supposed errors assigned.

This is a fact case. The issues were submitted to the jury, and they found for defendant in error. As we believe substantial justice has been obtained, we do not feel inclined to disturb the judgment and send the case back for another trial. Whitaker v. McCarty (Com. App.) 221 S. W. 572.

There is no reversible error assigned, and the assignments are all overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 S.W. 356, 1921 Tex. App. LEXIS 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-evans-texapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack