Ramsey v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar

621 So. 2d 1319, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 569, 1993 WL 196245
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 11, 1993·No. 1911864·Published

Opinion

ADAMS, Justice.

Richard H. Ramsey III appeals from a 45-day suspension from the practice of law imposed by the Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar. We affirm.

Mr. Ramsey was charged with violating DR 1-102(A)(4), (5), and (6), and he was found guilty on all three counts. After carefully considering the arguments of both parties and thoroughly examining the record on appeal, we conclude that the order of the Disciplinary Board is due to be affirmed on the authority of Noojin v. Alabama State Bar, 577 So.2d 420 (Ala.1990).

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and SHORES, HOUSTON and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramsey v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar, 621 So. 2d 1319, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 569, 1993 WL 196245 (Ala. 1993).

621 So. 2d 1319 (Ramsey v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Noojin v. Alabama State Bar
577 So. 2d 420 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1990)