Ramsey v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ramsey v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar

621 So. 2d 1319, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 569, 1993 WL 196245

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 11, 1993

Docket1911864

StatusPublished

This text of 621 So. 2d 1319 (Ramsey v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramsey v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar, 621 So. 2d 1319, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 569, 1993 WL 196245 (Ala. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ADAMS, Justice.

Richard H. Ramsey III appeals from a 45-day suspension from the practice of law imposed by the Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar. We affirm.

Mr. Ramsey was charged with violating DR 1-102(A)(4), (5), and (6), and he was found guilty on all three counts. After carefully considering the arguments of both parties and thoroughly examining the record on appeal, we conclude that the order of the Disciplinary Board is due to be affirmed on the authority of Noojin v. Alabama State Bar, 577 So.2d 420 (Ala.1990).

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and SHORES, HOUSTON and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI