Ramsey v. Commonwealth
This text of 278 S.W.2d 736 (Ramsey v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of possessing alcoholic beverages for the purpose of sale in local option territory.
The appellant admitted having two glasses or mugs of beer in her hands when the officers entered the restaurant where she was working. She apparently was intending to serve beer to customers seated at a booth. Eighty-six cans of Carling’s beer and ale and twenty-five additional quarts of beer were found on the premises.
Finding no error prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 S.W.2d 736, 1955 Ky. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1955.