Ramsey v. Bordenyuk
This text of Ramsey v. Bordenyuk (Ramsey v. Bordenyuk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 20-FEB-2025 11:54 AM Dkt. 5 ODSAC
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
JOSEPH RAMSEY, Respondent/Petitioner-Appellee,
vs.
OLGA BORDENYUK, a.k.a. Olga V. Bordenyuk, a.k.a. Olga Vladimirovna Bordenyuk, a.k.a. Olga Harrison, Petitioner/Respondent-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE. NO. 2CSP-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-
referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate
Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of
certiorari was filed, see Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes § 602-59(a)
(2017); see also Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP)
Rule 36(b)(1) (2016),
It is ordered that Petitioner/Respondent-Appellant’s
application for writ of certiorari, filed February 19, 2025, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application
pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2023) (“The application shall be
filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate
court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless
the time for filing the application is extended in accordance
with this rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 20, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ramsey v. Bordenyuk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-bordenyuk-haw-2025.