Ramseur v. United States

283 F. App'x 998
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 24, 2008
Docket07-2135
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 283 F. App'x 998 (Ramseur v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramseur v. United States, 283 F. App'x 998 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joann Jeffries Ramseur appeals the magistrate judge’s order * granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, the United States of America, and dismissing her claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ramseur v. United States, No. 8:06-cv-02995-WGC (D.Md. Oct. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duncan-Bogley v. United States
356 F. Supp. 3d 529 (D. Maryland, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 F. App'x 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramseur-v-united-states-ca4-2008.