Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Ramseur v. Hudsonview Co.

Ramseur v. Hudsonview Co.

88 A.D.3d 575, 931 N.Y.2d 233
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 20, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.3d 575 (Ramseur v. Hudsonview Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramseur v. Hudsonview Co., 88 A.D.3d 575, 931 N.Y.2d 233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The credible evidence plainly supports the Referee’s fact-finding determination that plaintiff materially and substantially breached the settlement agreement and his lease, by his underpayment and nonpayment of rent without justification or judicial limitations, warranting the award of attorneys’ fees to defendants based on express provisions in both of those agreements (see e.g. Mar Investors Corp. v Cerda, 208 AD2d 355 [1994]).

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.R, Sweeny, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mar Investors Corp. v. Cerda
208 A.D.2d 355 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.3d 575, 931 N.Y.2d 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramseur-v-hudsonview-co-nyappdiv-2011.