Ramsdell v. Bonser

22 Ohio Law. Abs. 128, 1936 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1201

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided March 9, 1936·No. No 5015·Published

Opinion

OPINION

By ROSS, PJ.

This is a companion case to No. 5014.

In this case a number of defendants named in the petition, but not served, and, therefore, not bound by the judgment below have been omitted.

In 15 Abs 174, the same question was presented and the court found such persons were improper as defendants in error. See also: 2 Ohio Jur., §171, p. 193-194.

The motion will be overruled.

MATTHEWS and HAMILTON, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

By ROSS, PJ.

This is a companion case to No. 5014.

In this case a number of defendants named in the petition, but not served, and, therefore, not bound by the judgment below have been omitted.

In 15 Abs 174, the same question was presented and the court found such persons were improper as defendants in error. See also: 2 Ohio Jur., §171, p. 193-194.

The motion will be overruled.

MATTHEWS and HAMILTON, JJ, concur.

Ramsdell v. Bonser, 22 Ohio Law. Abs. 128, 1936 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1201 (Ohio Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

22 Ohio Law. Abs. 128 (Ramsdell v. Bonser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Myers, Exrx. v. Hogue

187 N.E. 127 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1932)

Opinion

Related