Ramsay v. Ramsay
This text of 168 So. 12 (Ramsay v. Ramsay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from interlocutory orders of Chancery Court entered in a divorce case. The orders appealed from being within the sound discretion of the Chancellor, are affirmed on the authority of Demos v. Walker, 99 Fla. 302, 125 Sou. Rep. 305; Holly v. Holly, 81 Fla. 881, 89 Sou. Rep. 132; Floyd v. Floyd, 91 Fla. 910, 108 Sou. Rep. 896; O’Gara v. Hancock, 76 Fla. 1, 79 Sou. Rep. *267 167; Rausch v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc., 77 Fla. 846, 82 Sou. Rep. 295. No abuse of discretion has been made to appear.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 So. 12, 124 Fla. 266, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsay-v-ramsay-fla-1936.