Ramsay v. Ramsay

168 So. 12, 124 Fla. 266, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1102
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 6, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 168 So. 12 (Ramsay v. Ramsay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramsay v. Ramsay, 168 So. 12, 124 Fla. 266, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1102 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from interlocutory orders of Chancery Court entered in a divorce case. The orders appealed from being within the sound discretion of the Chancellor, are affirmed on the authority of Demos v. Walker, 99 Fla. 302, 125 Sou. Rep. 305; Holly v. Holly, 81 Fla. 881, 89 Sou. Rep. 132; Floyd v. Floyd, 91 Fla. 910, 108 Sou. Rep. 896; O’Gara v. Hancock, 76 Fla. 1, 79 Sou. Rep. *267 167; Rausch v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc., 77 Fla. 846, 82 Sou. Rep. 295. No abuse of discretion has been made to appear.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur. Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Floyd v. Floyd
108 So. 896 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Demos v. Walker
126 So. 305 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
O'Gara v. Hancock
79 So. 167 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)
Rausch v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
82 So. 295 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Holly v. Holly
89 So. 132 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 So. 12, 124 Fla. 266, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsay-v-ramsay-fla-1936.