Ramsay v. Milner

Mississippi Supreme Court

Ramsay v. Milner

4 So. 2d 889, 192 Miss. 120, 1941 Miss. LEXIS 24

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 8, 1941

DocketNo. 34760.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 4 So. 2d 889 (Ramsay v. Milner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramsay v. Milner, 4 So. 2d 889, 192 Miss. 120, 1941 Miss. LEXIS 24 (Mich. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Griffith, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

No brief has been filed by appellee in this case, nor was there any oral argument. The record is neither lengthy *121 nor complicated, but appellant makes at least two points as grounds for reversal, the answers to which are not at once, or manifestly, apparent; wherefore a brief upon them in behalf of appellee is necessary, and since appellee has himself filed no brief, the preparation thereof would have to be undertaken by us. In Raleigh Co. v. Armstrong, 165 Miss. 380, 140 So. 527, we stated in effect that this would not be done by us, and we there laid down the rules under which we would act in this state of case; and applying the rule to the present case, the judgment must be reversed without prejudice, and the cause remanded.

So- ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffith, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

No brief has been filed by appellee in this case, nor was there any oral argument. The record is neither lengthy *121 nor complicated, but appellant makes at least two points as grounds for reversal, the answers to which are not at once, or manifestly, apparent; wherefore a brief upon them in behalf of appellee is necessary, and since appellee has himself filed no brief, the preparation thereof would have to be undertaken by us. In Raleigh Co. v. Armstrong, 165 Miss. 380, 140 So. 527, we stated in effect that this would not be done by us, and we there laid down the rules under which we would act in this state of case; and applying the rule to the present case, the judgment must be reversed without prejudice, and the cause remanded.

So- ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 So. 2d 889, 192 Miss. 120, 1941 Miss. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsay-v-milner-miss-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack