Ramsay v. Jones (In Re Jones)

175 B.R. 994, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1990, 1994 WL 715800
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas
DecidedAugust 2, 1994
DocketBankruptcy No. 92-42755M. Adv. Nos. 93-4057M, 93-4058M
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 175 B.R. 994 (Ramsay v. Jones (In Re Jones)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramsay v. Jones (In Re Jones), 175 B.R. 994, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1990, 1994 WL 715800 (Ark. 1994).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES G. MIXON, Chief Judge.

On November 12, 1992, Guy Hamilton Jones, Jr. (“Jones”) and Guy Jones, Jr., P.A. (“the P.A.”) filed voluntary petitions for relief under the provisions of Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Jones is an attorney, who conducts his legal profession through the professional association, Guy Jones, Jr., P.A. Richard L. Ramsay was appointed the trustee in both cases.

On April 15, 1993, the trustee and Mary Jones, Christopher Jones, and Thomas E. Jones, Jr. (“the plaintiffs”) filed complaints objecting to Jones’s discharge. Jones filed timely answers denying the essential allegations of each of the complaints. The proceedings were consolidated for trial by agreement, and the trial was conducted beginning October 27, 1993.

The proceeding before the Court is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J) (1988), and the Court has jurisdiction to enter a final judgment in the case. The following shall constitute the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R.Bankr.P. 7052.

BACKGROUND

11 U.S.C. § 727 (1988) lists various grounds upon which a debtor’s discharge may be denied. The plaintiffs allege that Jones violated the following subsections:

11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)
(a) The court shall grant the debtor a discharge, unless—
(2) the debtor, with intent to hinder, delay, or defraud a creditor or an officer of the estate charged with custody of property under this title, has transferred ... or concealed, or has permitted to be transferred, ... or concealed—
*997 (A) property of the debtor, within one year before the date of the filing of the petition; or
(B) property of the estate, after the date of the filing of the petition.
11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(3)
(a) The court shall grant the debtor a discharge, unless—
(3) the debtor has concealed, destroyed, ... or failed to keep or preserve any recorded information, including books, documents, records, and papers, from which the debtor’s financial condition or business transactions might be ascertained, unless such act or failure to act was justified under all of the circumstances of the case.
11 U.S.C. § 727(a)U)(A) and (D)
(a) The court shall grant the debtor a discharge, unless—
(4) the debtor knowingly and fraudulently, in or in connection with the case—
(A) made a false oath or account;
(D) withheld from an officer of the estate entitled to possession under this title, any recorded information, including books, documents, records, and papers, relating to the debtor’s property or financial affairs.
11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(7)
(а) The court shall grant the debtor a discharge, unless—
(7) the debtor has committed any act specified in paragraph (2), (3), (4), (5), or (б) of this subsection, on or within one year before the date of the filing of the petition, or during the case, in connection with another case, under this title or under the Bankruptcy Act, concerning an insider.

The plaintiffs have the burden of proving facts essential to an objection to discharge by a preponderance of the evidence. See Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279, 111 S.Ct. 654, 112 L.Ed.2d 755 (1991); First Commercial Bank. v. Locke (In re Locke), 50 B.R. 443, 451 (Bankr.E.D.Ark.1985); Fed. R.Bankr.P. 4005. However, once a creditor introduces proof that the debtor committed any of the prohibited acts, the debtor has the burden of coming forward with evidence to explain his conduct. Jolles v. Freedman (In re Freedman), 693 F.2d 50, 51 (8th Cir.1982).

The plaintiffs introduced evidence of several acts and omissions by Jones in his individual case and by Jones in connection with the P.A. ease. Jones’s discharge can be denied if he violated the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 727 in either ease. 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(7) (1988); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 727.10 (Lawrence P. King ed., 15th ed. 1994).

The plaintiffs’ allegations as to each ground will be discussed separately below:

I

11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A) and (a)(7)

(False Oath)

The plaintiffs introduced evidence that the debtor in both eases failed to schedule bank accounts and scheduled other accounts inaccurately. The plaintiffs also introduced evidence that Jones failed to schedule property he owned on the date the petition was filed and failed to answer questions correctly on his schedules. Jones was called to the stand by the plaintiffs, but he testified only to his name, and invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege in response to other questions that were asked.

The plaintiffs introduced the following evidence concerning this count of their complaints:

Bank Accounts

Schedule B of a bankruptcy petition requires a debtor to list all personal property of whatever kind that a debtor owns as of the date the bankruptcy petition is filed. The debtors listed ownership of bank accounts as follows:

*998 Individual Case 1st Nat’l Bank $1,100.00 Conway AR Personal Checking
PA Case Worthen Bank 3,600.00 Conway AR General Ofc Aect
PA Case Worthen Bank 347.00 Conway AR Escrow Account
PA Case Worthen Bank 25.00 Conway AR Tax & Insurance

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 B.R. 994, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1990, 1994 WL 715800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsay-v-jones-in-re-jones-areb-1994.