Ramsay v. Garcia-Guajardo
This text of 613 F. App'x 224 (Ramsay v. Garcia-Guajardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Roberta L. Garcia-Guajardo and Steven Guajardo appeal the district court’s order denying their Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(8), (4), and (d)(3) motions to set aside the judgment against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ramsey v. Garcia-Guajardo, No. 2:11-cv-00207-MSD-LRL (E.D.Va. May 5, 2015). We deny Appellants’ motion for a stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
613 F. App'x 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsay-v-garcia-guajardo-ca4-2015.