Ramsay v. Davis
This text of 20 Wis. 31 (Ramsay v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
"We are furnished with no briefs by the appellant, and we are therefore ignorant of the points upon which he relies for a reversal of the judgment. Neither is there any bill of exceptions. The printed case states that there was no notice of trial served. This objection is not sustained by the record and papers returned to this court. But even if it were true that no notice of trial was given, the defendant should have moved in the court below to set aside the judgment on that ground. "W"e think the appeal was manifestly taken for delay, and we there[32]*32fore afñrm tire judgment with fiye per cent, damages in addition to tire seven percent, damages given on affirmance'of judgments.
By the Oourt. — Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Wis. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsay-v-davis-wis-1865.