Rampello v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rampello v. Jones

26 A.D.2d 610, 271 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3974

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 17, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 610 (Rampello v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rampello v. Jones, 26 A.D.2d 610, 271 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment insofar as it is in favor of plaintiff Sam Rampello, and the order, as to said plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Judgment insofar as it is in favor of plaintiff Viola Rampello, and the order, as to said plaintiff, unanimously reversed and a new trial granted on the question of damages only, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The verdict in favor of Viola Rampello is inadequate. (Appeal from judgment of M6iti8§ Trial Term for plaintiffs in an automobile negligence action; also agpéál by plaintiffs from an order denying motion to set aside the verdict of the jui'y upon all grounds except excessiveness.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, Jj.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment insofar as it is in favor of plaintiff Sam Rampello, and the order, as to said plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Judgment insofar as it is in favor of plaintiff Viola Rampello, and the order, as to said plaintiff, unanimously reversed and a new trial granted on the question of damages only, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The verdict in favor of Viola Rampello is inadequate. (Appeal from judgment of M6iti8§ Trial Term for plaintiffs in an automobile negligence action; also agpéál by plaintiffs from an order denying motion to set aside the verdict of the jui'y upon all grounds except excessiveness.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, Jj.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 610, 271 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rampello-v-jones-nyappdiv-1966.