Rampart Capital Corporation v. Abke

1 S.W.3d 107, 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1027, 1999 Tex. LEXIS 96, 1999 WL 450837
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1999·No. No. 98-0552·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Justice HECHT,

joined by Justice OWEN,

dissenting from the denial of the petition for review.

I respectfully dissent from the Court’s denial of the petition for review. This is a suit on a promissory note against a limited partner in circumstances described in Rampart Capital Corporation v. Maguire, 974 S.W.2d 195 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1998, pet. denied). In an unpublished opinion essentially identical to its opinion in Maguire, a divided court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the action for want of prosecution. As in Maguire, I would grant Rampart’s petition, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, and remand the case for further proceedings. Rampart Capital Corp. v. Maguire, 1 S.W.3d 106 (Tex.1999) (Hecht, J., dissenting).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rampart Capital Corporation v. Abke, 1 S.W.3d 107, 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1027, 1999 Tex. LEXIS 96, 1999 WL 450837 (Tex. 1999).

1 S.W.3d 107 (Rampart Capital Corporation v. Abke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guest v. Dixon
223 S.W.3d 531 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)