Rampart Capital Corporation v. Abke

1 S.W.3d 107, 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1027, 1999 Tex. LEXIS 96, 1999 WL 450837
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1999
DocketNo. 98-0552
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 S.W.3d 107 (Rampart Capital Corporation v. Abke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rampart Capital Corporation v. Abke, 1 S.W.3d 107, 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1027, 1999 Tex. LEXIS 96, 1999 WL 450837 (Tex. 1999).

Opinions

Justice HECHT,

joined by Justice OWEN,

dissenting from the denial of the petition for review.

I respectfully dissent from the Court’s denial of the petition for review. This is a suit on a promissory note against a limited partner in circumstances described in Rampart Capital Corporation v. Maguire, 974 S.W.2d 195 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1998, pet. denied). In an unpublished opinion essentially identical to its opinion in Maguire, a divided court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the action for want of prosecution. As in Maguire, I would grant Rampart’s petition, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, and remand the case for further proceedings. Rampart Capital Corp. v. Maguire, 1 S.W.3d 106 (Tex.1999) (Hecht, J., dissenting).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guest v. Dixon
223 S.W.3d 531 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 S.W.3d 107, 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1027, 1999 Tex. LEXIS 96, 1999 WL 450837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rampart-capital-corporation-v-abke-tex-1999.