Ramos v. Vera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ramos v. Vera

226 A.D.2d 516, 640 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1996·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Eliodoro Vera appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated July 8, 1994, which denied [517]*517his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant failed to submit sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption that at the time of the accident, the car owned by the appellant was driven by the defendant Ismael Vera with the appellant’s permission (see, Guerrieri v Gray, 203 AD2d 324, 325). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Eliodoro Vera appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated July 8, 1994, which denied [517]*517his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant failed to submit sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption that at the time of the accident, the car owned by the appellant was driven by the defendant Ismael Vera with the appellant’s permission (see, Guerrieri v Gray, 203 AD2d 324, 325). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Ramos v. Vera, 226 A.D.2d 516, 640 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

226 A.D.2d 516 (Ramos v. Vera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related