Ramos v. Vera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ramos v. Vera

226 A.D.2d 516, 640 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 226 A.D.2d 516 (Ramos v. Vera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramos v. Vera, 226 A.D.2d 516, 640 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Eliodoro Vera appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated July 8, 1994, which denied [517]*517his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant failed to submit sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption that at the time of the accident, the car owned by the appellant was driven by the defendant Ismael Vera with the appellant’s permission (see, Guerrieri v Gray, 203 AD2d 324, 325). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Eliodoro Vera appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated July 8, 1994, which denied [517]*517his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant failed to submit sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption that at the time of the accident, the car owned by the appellant was driven by the defendant Ismael Vera with the appellant’s permission (see, Guerrieri v Gray, 203 AD2d 324, 325). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 A.D.2d 516, 640 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramos-v-vera-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack