Ramos v. TIEFHOCH CONTRACTING, INC.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Ramos v. TIEFHOCH CONTRACTING, INC.

706 N.W.2d 911, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 812, 2005 WL 3547980

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 22, 2005

DocketA05-1842

StatusPublished

This text of 706 N.W.2d 911 (Ramos v. TIEFHOCH CONTRACTING, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramos v. TIEFHOCH CONTRACTING, INC., 706 N.W.2d 911, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 812, 2005 WL 3547980 (Mich. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

*912 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 19, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Helen H. Meyer Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI