Ramos v. TIEFHOCH CONTRACTING, INC.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Ramos v. TIEFHOCH CONTRACTING, INC.

706 N.W.2d 911, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 812, 2005 WL 3547980

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 22, 2005·No. A05-1842·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

*912 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 19, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Helen H. Meyer Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

*912 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 19, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Helen H. Meyer Associate Justice

Ramos v. TIEFHOCH CONTRACTING, INC., 706 N.W.2d 911, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 812, 2005 WL 3547980 (Mich. 2005).

Pincite

706 N.W.2d 911 (Ramos v. TIEFHOCH CONTRACTING, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related