Ramos v. State

46 S.W.2d 1116
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ramos v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 Tex. Crim. 512
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 17, 1932·No. No. 15064·Published

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.

Burglary is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The evidence heard before the trial court is n-ot here. In the motion for new trial are a number of criticisms of the rulings of the trial court. None of the complaints are supported by bills of exception, and none of them are available for review without bills of exception. Moreover, this court would not be able to appraise the complaints of the procedure in the absence of knowledge of the facts which were in evidence. We find in the record nothing presented for review which would justify or authbrize a reversal of the judgment.

It is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramos v. State, 46 S.W.2d 1116 (Tex. 1932).

46 S.W.2d 1116 (Ramos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.