Ramos v. State

160 S.W. 380, 71 Tex. Crim. 484, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 494
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 22, 1913·No. No. 2671.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of murder in the first degree, and his punishment assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for life.

Ho bills of exception or statement of facts accompanies the record, and no ground is assigned in the motion for a new trial we can review in the absence of a statement of facts. The first ground in the motion is that the court erred in submitting the issue of murder in the first degree; and another is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict. All understand that with no evidence before us we can not review these questions. The only other ground in the motion for a new trial is that the witness John Salter was incompetent to testify. Ho evidence as to his incompetency accompanies the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramos v. State, 160 S.W. 380, 71 Tex. Crim. 484, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 494 (Tex. 1913).

160 S.W. 380 (Ramos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lucas v. State
86 S.W.2d 638 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)