Ramos v. State
This text of 160 S.W. 380 (Ramos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of murder in the first degree, and his punishment assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for life.
Ho bills of exception or statement of facts accompanies the record, and no ground is assigned in the motion for a new trial we can review in the absence of a statement of facts. The first ground in the motion is that the court erred in submitting the issue of murder in the first degree; and another is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict. All understand that with no evidence before us we can not review these questions. The only other ground in the motion for a new trial is that the witness John Salter was incompetent to testify. Ho evidence as to his incompetency accompanies the record.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 S.W. 380, 71 Tex. Crim. 484, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramos-v-state-texcrimapp-1913.