Ramos v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ramos v. State

156 So. 3d 591, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1460, 2015 WL 468946

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 5, 2015

DocketNo. 1D13-6041

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 156 So. 3d 591 (Ramos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramos v. State, 156 So. 3d 591, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1460, 2015 WL 468946 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is brought under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the record on appeal, we affirm Appellant’s conviction for aggravated battery while in actual possession of a firearm and the ten-year mandatory minimum sentence the trial court imposed.

However, the record reveals potential errors in the imposition of costs and fees, and a discrepancy between the total amount orally announced and the total reflected in the written judgment and sentence. In order to reverse for sentencing errors in an Anders appeal, the appellant must have preserved the errors either by objecting when the sentence was imposed or by filing a motion to correct sentencing errors. See A.L.B. v. State, 23 So.3d 190, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Appellant did neither in this case; therefore we must [592]*592affirm. But we do so without prejudice to his hereafter filing an appropriate post-conviction motion. See A.L.B., 23 So.3d at 192 (“Today’s affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief collaterally[.]”); Colon v. State, 869 So.2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

LEWIS, C.J., CLARK and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is brought under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the record on appeal, we affirm Appellant’s conviction for aggravated battery while in actual possession of a firearm and the ten-year mandatory minimum sentence the trial court imposed.

However, the record reveals potential errors in the imposition of costs and fees, and a discrepancy between the total amount orally announced and the total reflected in the written judgment and sentence. In order to reverse for sentencing errors in an Anders appeal, the appellant must have preserved the errors either by objecting when the sentence was imposed or by filing a motion to correct sentencing errors. See A.L.B. v. State, 23 So.3d 190, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Appellant did neither in this case; therefore we must [592]*592affirm. But we do so without prejudice to his hereafter filing an appropriate post-conviction motion. See A.L.B., 23 So.3d at 192 (“Today’s affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief collaterally[.]”); Colon v. State, 869 So.2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

LEWIS, C.J., CLARK and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 So. 3d 591, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1460, 2015 WL 468946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramos-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack