Ramos v. State

625 So. 2d 1249, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9061, 1993 WL 341158
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ramos v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 658 So. 2d 169
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 8, 1993·No. No. 92-02694·Published

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

The appellant challenges his sentences as a habitual felony offender after revocation of probation in three cases. We reverse in part.

In circuit court cases 82-7583 and 82-7489, the appellant was not furnished notice of the intent to treat him as a habitual felony offender prior to the entry of his pleas of guilty. As to these cases, we reverse and remand for resentencing. See Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla.1993).

As to circuit court case 90-7416, the appellant was properly served and sentenced as a habitual felony offender. We therefore affirm the sentence in that case.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

FRANK, C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramos v. State, 625 So. 2d 1249, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9061, 1993 WL 341158 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

625 So. 2d 1249 (Ramos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ashley v. State
614 So. 2d 486 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)