Ramos v. Sabadell United Bank, N.A.
This text of 137 So. 3d 557 (Ramos v. Sabadell United Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals the trial court’s Final Judgment of Foreclosure with Assessment of Attorney’s Fees and Costs. Appellee, Sabadell United Bank, N.A., confesses error and acknowledges that, at the time the trial court entered the final judgment of foreclosure, the affirmative defense based on paragraph 22 created a disputed issue of material fact. We reverse the Final Judgment of Foreclosure and remand without prejudice to appellee filing an amended motion for summary judgment addressing the disputed issue raised in the affirmative defense.
Reversed and Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 So. 3d 557, 2014 WL 1464531, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramos-v-sabadell-united-bank-na-fladistctapp-2014.