Ramos v. Sabadell United Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Appellant appeals the trial court’s Final Judgment of Foreclosure with Assessment of Attorney’s Fees and Costs. Appellee, Sabadell United Bank, N.A., confesses error and acknowledges that, at the time the trial court entered the final judgment of foreclosure, the affirmative defense based on paragraph 22 created a disputed issue of material fact. We reverse the Final Judgment of Foreclosure and remand without prejudice to appellee filing an amended motion for summary judgment addressing the disputed issue raised in the affirmative defense.
Reversed and Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
137 So. 3d 557 (Ramos v. Sabadell United Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.