Ramos v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ramos v. Ramos

13 A.D.2d 726, 214 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11116

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 4, 1961·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order entered on January 10, 1961, providing maintenance for the children of the parties and the support of plaintiff wife, pendente lite, and counsel tee, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by eliminating the provision for support of the plaintiff and for counsel fee and providing for the payment by the defendant-appellant of the sum of $30 per week for the support of the children, and reserving the issues in respect of plaintiff’s support and counsel fee to the trial court, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. At the time of the commencement of this action the parties were actually living together in the same apartment. (Rothenberg v. Rothenberg, 8 A D 2d 703.) Settle order on notice. Order entered on December 21, 1960, denying defendant’s motion for reconsideration of plaintiff’s motion for temporary alimony and counsel fee, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on January 10, 1961, providing maintenance for the children of the parties and the support of plaintiff wife, pendente lite, and counsel tee, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by eliminating the provision for support of the plaintiff and for counsel fee and providing for the payment by the defendant-appellant of the sum of $30 per week for the support of the children, and reserving the issues in respect of plaintiff’s support and counsel fee to the trial court, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. At the time of the commencement of this action the parties were actually living together in the same apartment. (Rothenberg v. Rothenberg, 8 A D 2d 703.) Settle order on notice. Order entered on December 21, 1960, denying defendant’s motion for reconsideration of plaintiff’s motion for temporary alimony and counsel fee, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.

Ramos v. Ramos, 13 A.D.2d 726, 214 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

13 A.D.2d 726 (Ramos v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related