Ramos v. Miami Herald Media Co.
132 So. 3d 1236, 2014 WL 784966, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2592
Opinion
Affirmed. See Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp, 997 So.2d 1098, 1108 n. 13 (Fla.2008) (holding that “truth remains an available [1237] defense to defendants who can prove that the defamatory implication is true” in a defamation by implication action); see also Woodard v. Sunbeam Television Corp., 616 So.2d 501, 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (holding that the media has a qualified privilege to report the information they receive from government officials).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramos v. Miami Herald Media Co., 132 So. 3d 1236, 2014 WL 784966, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2592 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
132 So. 3d 1236 (Ramos v. Miami Herald Media Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp
997 So. 2d 1098 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
Woodard v. Sunbeam Television Corp.
616 So. 2d 501 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)