Ramos v. Miami Herald Media Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ramos v. Miami Herald Media Co.

132 So. 3d 1236, 2014 WL 784966, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2592

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 26, 2014

DocketNo. 3D13-1788

StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 3d 1236 (Ramos v. Miami Herald Media Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramos v. Miami Herald Media Co., 132 So. 3d 1236, 2014 WL 784966, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2592 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp, 997 So.2d 1098, 1108 n. 13 (Fla.2008) (holding that “truth remains an available [1237]*1237defense to defendants who can prove that the defamatory implication is true” in a defamation by implication action); see also Woodard v. Sunbeam Television Corp., 616 So.2d 501, 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (holding that the media has a qualified privilege to report the information they receive from government officials).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp, 997 So.2d 1098, 1108 n. 13 (Fla.2008) (holding that “truth remains an available [1237]*1237defense to defendants who can prove that the defamatory implication is true” in a defamation by implication action); see also Woodard v. Sunbeam Television Corp., 616 So.2d 501, 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (holding that the media has a qualified privilege to report the information they receive from government officials).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 So. 3d 1236, 2014 WL 784966, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramos-v-miami-herald-media-co-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack