Ramos v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

269 A.D.2d 220, 702 N.Y.S.2d 818, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1530
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 220 (Ramos v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramos v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 269 A.D.2d 220, 702 N.Y.S.2d 818, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered July 9, 1999, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ respective motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[221]*221Defendants’ motions for summary judgment were properly denied since plaintiffs deposition testimony raises issues of fact as to whether either or both of the defendants created the condition (a tree limb on the sidewalk) that allegedly caused plaintiff to trip and fall. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vazquez v. Santana
291 A.D.2d 230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 220, 702 N.Y.S.2d 818, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramos-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-2000.