Ramos v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ramos v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

269 A.D.2d 220, 702 N.Y.S.2d 818, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1530

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered July 9, 1999, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ respective motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[221] Defendants’ motions for summary judgment were properly denied since plaintiffs deposition testimony raises issues of fact as to whether either or both of the defendants created the condition (a tree limb on the sidewalk) that allegedly caused plaintiff to trip and fall. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered July 9, 1999, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ respective motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[221] Defendants’ motions for summary judgment were properly denied since plaintiffs deposition testimony raises issues of fact as to whether either or both of the defendants created the condition (a tree limb on the sidewalk) that allegedly caused plaintiff to trip and fall. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Ramos v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 269 A.D.2d 220, 702 N.Y.S.2d 818, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

269 A.D.2d 220 (Ramos v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related