Ramos v. Kuzas
594 N.E.2d 972, 64 Ohio St. 3d 1431, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 4058
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ramos v. Kuzas. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 Ohio St. 3d 42 →
Opinion
Cuyahoga County, Nos. 60495 and 60932. On motions to certify the record and to consolidate with 91-2558, Berdyck v. Shinde, Ottawa County, No. 90-OT-060. Motion to consolidate overruled; motion to certify allowed; sua sponte, cause held for decision in
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramos v. Kuzas, 594 N.E.2d 972, 64 Ohio St. 3d 1431, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 4058 (Ohio 1992).
594 N.E.2d 972 (Ramos v. Kuzas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.