Ramos v. Hartford Fire Insurance

113 A. 926, 95 N.J.L. 262, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 282
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 15, 1920·Published

Opinion

Per CuktaM.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Ber-geN, MiNtubN, Kalirch, Black:, KatzenbaCH, White, GARDNER, HEPPENHETMER. WILLIAMS, ÁCKERSON, JJ. 12. For reversal — Xone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramos v. Hartford Fire Insurance, 113 A. 926, 95 N.J.L. 262, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 282 (N.J. 1920).

113 A. 926 (Ramos v. Hartford Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.