Ramos v. Hartford Fire Insurance

113 A. 926, 95 N.J.L. 262, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 282
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 15, 1920
StatusPublished

This text of 113 A. 926 (Ramos v. Hartford Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramos v. Hartford Fire Insurance, 113 A. 926, 95 N.J.L. 262, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 282 (N.J. 1920).

Opinion

Per CuktaM.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Ber-geN, MiNtubN, Kalirch, Black:, KatzenbaCH, White, GARDNER, HEPPENHETMER. WILLIAMS, ÁCKERSON, JJ. 12. For reversal — Xone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 A. 926, 95 N.J.L. 262, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramos-v-hartford-fire-insurance-nj-1920.