Ramos v. Department of Corrections & Community Supervision

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ramos v. Department of Corrections & Community Supervision

123 A.D.3d 1215, 995 N.Y.S.2d 866

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A.D.3d 1215 (Ramos v. Department of Corrections & Community Supervision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramos v. Department of Corrections & Community Supervision, 123 A.D.3d 1215, 995 N.Y.S.2d 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding to challenge a prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of making a false statement, being out of place and a movement regulation viola[1216]*1216tion. The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge refunded to his inmate account. As petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Scott v Fischer, 119 AD3d 1307 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., Stein, Rose, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding to challenge a prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of making a false statement, being out of place and a movement regulation viola[1216]*1216tion. The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge refunded to his inmate account. As petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Scott v Fischer, 119 AD3d 1307 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., Stein, Rose, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.3d 1215, 995 N.Y.S.2d 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramos-v-department-of-corrections-community-supervision-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack