Ramos v. Cohn
508 A.2d 848, 7 Conn. App. 549, 1986 Conn. App. LEXIS 996
This text of 508 A.2d 848 (Ramos v. Cohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ramos v. Cohn, 508 A.2d 848, 7 Conn. App. 549, 1986 Conn. App. LEXIS 996 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986).
Opinion
In this action on a promissory note, the defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff. He claims that the court erred in denying his motion to amend his pleadings shortly [550]*550before trial. We have fully considered the arguments of the defendant and find that he has not established that the court abused its discretion.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
508 A.2d 848, 7 Conn. App. 549, 1986 Conn. App. LEXIS 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramos-v-cohn-connappct-1986.