Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Ramos v. City of New York

Ramos v. City of New York

307 A.D.2d 819, 762 N.Y.S.2d 807, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8643
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ramos v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 285 A.D.2d 284 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 7, 2003·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered December 11, 2002, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendant’s liability for malicious prosecution, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The issues of fact identified in this Court’s prior order reinstating the cause of action for malicious prosecution (285 AD2d 284 [2001]) remain unresolved on the instant record (cf. Parkin v Cornell Univ., 78 NY2d 523, 529 [1991]; Munoz v City of New York, 18 NY2d 6 [1966]; Martin v City of Albany, 42 NY2d 13 [1977]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramos v. City of New York, 307 A.D.2d 819, 762 N.Y.S.2d 807, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8643 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

307 A.D.2d 819 (Ramos v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munoz v. City of New York
218 N.E.2d 527 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)
Martin v. City of Albany
364 N.E.2d 1304 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Parkin v. Cornell University, Inc.
583 N.E.2d 939 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Ramos v. City of New York
285 A.D.2d 284 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)