Ramos v. Artco Store Fixtures
This text of 763 So. 2d 1211 (Ramos v. Artco Store Fixtures) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the order on all issues on appeal except one. The JCC erred in awarding the employer and carrier a social security offset taken retroactively. See South Fla. Water Management Dist. v. Ciacci, 647 So.2d 203, 205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (holding that an E/C may only take a social security offset prospectively, as of the date it exercises its right under statute). Accordingly, we AFFIRM in part, [1212]*1212REVERSE as to the retroactive social security offset, and REMAND to the JCC.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
763 So. 2d 1211, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5164, 2000 WL 524821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramos-v-artco-store-fixtures-fladistctapp-2000.