Ramos v. Apple Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 14, 2023·No. 7:22-cv-02761·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK pateriep: □□□□□□□□□□ □□□□ RAVEN RAMOS, JEFFREY MCNEILL, § and TYLER O’NEAL, individually andon —§ behalf of all similarly situated, § § Plaintiffs, § § Civil Action No. 22-cv-02761-NSR Vv. § § APPLE INC., § §

Defendant. § §

§ DRAFT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS Named Plaintiffs Raven Ramos, Jeffrey McNeill and Tyler O’Neal (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Defendant”) anticipate that documents, testimony, or information containing or reflecting confidential, proprietary, trade secret, and/or commercially sensitive information are likely to be disclosed or produced during the course of discovery in this case and request that the Court enter this Order setting forth the conditions for treating, obtaining, and using such information. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), the Court finds good cause for the following Stipulated Protective Order Regarding the Disclosure and Use of Discovery Materials (“Order” or “Protective Order”). 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS (a) Protected Material (defined below) designated under the terms of this Protective Order shall be used by a Receiving Party (defined below) solely for this case, and shall not be used directly or indirectly for any other purpose whatsoever.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - PAGE 1

(b) ThePartiesacknowledgethatthisOrderdoesnotconferblanketprotections on all disclosures during discovery. Designations under this Order shall be made with care and shall not be made absent a good faith belief that the designated material satisfies the criteria set forth below. If it comes to the attention of a Producing Party (defined below) that designated materialdoesnotqualifyforprotectionatall,ordoesnotqualifyforthelevelofprotectioninitially

asserted, the Producing Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing or changingthe designation. (c) The Parties agree that this Order does not address the production of source code (including source and source code listings, object code and object code listings, executable code,and similar sensitive software code, whether in print or electronic form). Before any Party requests such source code, the Party making that request shall provide notice to all other Parties. Upon receipt of such notice, the Parties agree to collectively negotiate in good faith a protective ordergoverningtheproductionofsourcecode. (d) Nothing contained in this Order is intended to or shall serve to limit a

Party’s right to conduct a review of documents, electronically stored information or information (including metadata) for relevance, responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged or protected informationbefore production. 2. DEFINITIONS (a) “Discovery Material” means all items or information, including from any non-party,regardlessofthemediumormannergenerated,stored,ormaintained(including,among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced, disclosed, or generated inconnection with discoveryin thiscase. (b) “Outside Counsel” means (i) outside counsel who appear on the pleadings as counsel for a Party and (ii) partners, associates, and staff of such counsel to whom it is reasonably necessaryto disclose theinformation for thislitigation. (c) “Party” means any party to this case, includingall of its officers, directors, employees,consultants,vendors,retainedexperts, andOutsideCounsel andtheirsupportstaffs.

(d) “ProducingParty”means anyPartyornon-party that disclosesorproduces anyDiscoveryMaterial inthis case. (e) “Protected Material” means any Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as provided for in this Order. Protected Material shall not include: (i) advertising materials that have been actually published or publicly disseminated; and (ii) materials that show on their face they have been disseminatedto thepublic. (f) “Receiving Party” means any Party who receives Discovery Material from aProducing Party.

3. COMPUTATION OFTIME ThecomputationofanyperiodoftimeprescribedorallowedbythisOrdershallbe governedbytheprovisions forcomputingtimeset forthintheFederalRulesofCivil Procedure. 4. SCOPE (a) The protections conferred bythis Order cover not only Discovery Material governed by this Order as addressed herein, but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their counsel in court or in other settings that might

reveal ProtectedMaterial. (b) NothinginthisProtectiveOrdershallpreventorrestrictaProducingParty’s own disclosure or use of its own Protected Material for any purpose, and nothing in this Order shall preclude any Producing Party from showing its Protected Material to an individual who preparedthe ProtectedMaterial. (c) Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prejudice any Party’s right to

use any Protected Material in court or in any court filing with the consent of the Producing Party orbyorderoftheCourt. (d) This Order is without prejudice to the right of any Party to seek further or additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify this Order in any way, including, without limitation, an order that certain matter not beproducedatall. 5. DURATION Even after the termination of this case, the confidentiality obligations imposed by thisOrdershallremainineffectuntilaProducingPartyagreesotherwiseinwritingoracourtorder otherwise directs.

6. ACCESSTO ANDUSE OFPROTECTED MATERIAL (a) Basic Principles. All DiscoveryMaterial shall be usedsolely for this case or any related appellate proceeding, and not for any other purpose whatsoever, including without limitation any other litigation, patent prosecution or acquisition, patent reexamination or reissue proceedings, or any business or competitive purpose or function. Protected Material shall not be distributed,disclosedormade available to anyone except as expresslyprovidedinthis Order. (b) Secure Storage, No Export. Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location in the United States and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. To ensure compliance with applicable United States Export Administration Regulations, Protected Material may not be exported outside the United States or released to any foreign national (even if within the United States). (c) LegalAdviceBasedonProtectedMaterial.NothinginthisProtectiveOrder shallbe construedto prevent counsel from advisingtheirclients withrespectto this case based in

whole or in part upon Protected Materials, provided counsel does not disclose the Protected Materialitself except as providedinthis Order. (d) Limitations. Nothing in this Order shall restrict in any way a Producing Party’s useordisclosure of its ownProtected Material. Nothingin this Ordershall restrictin any way the use or disclosure of Discovery Material by a Receiving Party: (i) that is or has become publiclyknownthroughnofault oftheReceivingParty;(ii)thatislawfullyacquiredbyorknown to the Receiving Party independent of the Producing Party; (iii) previously produced, disclosed and/or provided by the Producing Party to the Receiving Party or a non-party without an obligation of confidentiality and not by inadvertence or mistake; (iv) with the consent of the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramos v. Apple Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Ramos v. Apple Inc. (Ramos v. Apple Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related