Ramos-Hernandez v. United States

466 F. App'x 894
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 26, 2012·No. No. 2012-1155·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Leonardo Ramos-Hernandez seeks review of the district court’s denial of his [895] “Motion of Recusal of All Judges in the District of Colorado for the Specific Matter of the Claim of Unconstitutionality of Local Rule 8.1” and his “Motion of Recusal of Senior Judge Lewis T Babcock.”

The court notes that “[a]n order denying a motion to recuse is interlocutory and is, therefore, not immediately appealable.” Nichols v. Alley, 71 F.3d 347, 350 (10th Cir.1995).

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

Absent objection received within 21 days of the date of filing of this order, this appeal shall be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramos-Hernandez v. United States, 466 F. App'x 894 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

466 F. App'x 894 (Ramos-Hernandez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related