Ramos and Cortez v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Ramos and Cortez v. State

151 So. 705, 113 Fla. 442, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1706

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 4, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judg-. ment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that *443 there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Criminal Court of Record be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, Ellis and Buford, J. J., concur.

Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judg-. ment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that *443 there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Criminal Court of Record be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, Ellis and Buford, J. J., concur.

Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., dissent.

Ramos and Cortez v. State, 151 So. 705, 113 Fla. 442, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1706 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

151 So. 705 (Ramos and Cortez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.