RAMONA TAVIA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of RAMONA TAVIA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (RAMONA TAVIA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 23, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-889 Lower Tribunal No. F94-5151B ________________
Ramona Tavia, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Joseph Perkins, Judge.
Ramona Tavia, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and HENDON and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011)
(recognizing that under rule 3.800(a) the burden is on the defendant to
demonstrate an entitlement to relief on the face of the record and that,
accordingly, the State has no burden to establish that the defendant is not
entitled to relief) (citing Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 2007) (holding
that under rule 3.800(a) the burden is on the defendant to demonstrate an
entitlement to relief on the face of the record and without an evidentiary
hearing)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
RAMONA TAVIA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramona-tavia-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.