RAMONA TAVIA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 2021·No. 21-0889·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 23, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D21-889

Lower Tribunal No. F94-5151B

Ramona Tavia,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Joseph Perkins, Judge.

Ramona Tavia, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and HENDON and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011)

(recognizing that under rule 3.800(a) the burden is on the defendant to demonstrate an entitlement to relief on the face of the record and that, accordingly, the State has no burden to establish that the defendant is not entitled to relief) (citing Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 2007) (holding that under rule 3.800(a) the burden is on the defendant to demonstrate an entitlement to relief on the face of the record and without an evidentiary hearing)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RAMONA TAVIA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

RAMONA TAVIA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (RAMONA TAVIA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
957 So. 2d 600 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
Johnson v. State
60 So. 3d 1045 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)