Ramona Powell v. Cherokee Insurance Company

476 F. App'x 77
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedAugust 20, 2012
Docket11-6537
StatusUnpublished

This text of 476 F. App'x 77 (Ramona Powell v. Cherokee Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramona Powell v. Cherokee Insurance Company, 476 F. App'x 77 (6th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-Appellant Ramona Powell alleges that Cherokee Insurance Company (“Cherokee”) violated Kentucky’s Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act (“UCS-PA”) in its processing of her third-party insurance claim. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Cherokee on the ground that Powell failed to present evidence that Cherokee had engaged in outrageous or egregious behavior, notwithstanding the undisputed delay in resolving her claim.

After the district court rendered its decision and the parties had fully briefed the issues in the instant appeal, we decided Phelps v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 680 F.3d 725 (6th Cir.2012), a case that considered similar claims of an insurer’s bad faith arising under the UCSPA. Because Phelps may be instructive in the resolution of the issues presented in the instant case, we hereby VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for reconsideration in light of our analysis in Phelps.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phelps v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
680 F.3d 725 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
476 F. App'x 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramona-powell-v-cherokee-insurance-company-ca6-2012.