Ramona C. Schrader v. A.L. Schrader

• Court: Court of Appeals of Tennessee
• Decided: December 30, 1996
• Docket: 02A01-9605-CH-00108
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FILED Dec. 30, 1996

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk

RAMONA C. SCHRADER, ) ) HENRY CHANCERY Defendant\Appellee ) v. ) ) A. L. SCHRADER, ) Appeal No. 02A01-9605-CH-00108 ) Petitioner\Appellant )

APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF GIBSON COUNTY AT TRENTON, TENNESSEE THE HONORABLE GEORGE R. ELLIS, CHANCELLOR

L. L. HARRELL, JR. JULIA J. TATE Harrell & Harrell Gracey, Ruth, Howard, Tate NW Court Square & Sowell Trenton, TN 38382 150 Second Avenue North, Suite 201 Nashville, TN 37201

AFFIRMED

WILLIAM H. INMAN, SENIOR JUDGE

CONCUR:

ALAN E. HIGHERS, JUDGE

HOLLY LILLARD, JUDGE

M E M O R A N D U M OP I N I O N These parties were divorced in 1981 following a 25-year marriage and the

birth of three children. The appellant was ordered to pay alimony of $950.00

monthly, well within his means as a practicing physician.

He is now 70 years old and in declining health. He has retired from practice

and alleges this fact superimposed upon his frailty amounts to such a change of

circumstances as to justify and require a reduction in the ordered payments.

The evidence reveals that he has a minimum of $457,200. in assets and the

overall thrust of the evidence justifies the conclusion of the trial judge that the

appellant had failed to prove such a change in circumstances as would require a

reduction in his alimony obligation. Our review of the findings of fact made by the

trial court is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a

presumption of the correctness of the finding, unless the preponderance of the

evidence is otherwise. TENN. CODE ANN . § 50-6-225(3)(2). Stone v. City of

McMinnville, 896 S.W.2d 584 (Tenn. 1991).

We think this is a proper case for affirmance pursuant to RULE 10, RULES OF

THE COURT OF APPEALS .1

The case is remanded for the assessment of attorney fees in the trial court

and on appeal as costs, which are taxed to the appellant.

William H. Inman, Senior Judge CONCUR:

______________________________ Alan E. Highers, Judge

_______________________________ Holly Lillard, Judge

1 10. Affirmance Without Opinion - Memorandum Opinion. (b) Memorandum Opinion. The Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating int he case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated “MEMORANDUM OPINION,’ shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in a subsequent unrelated case. [As amended by order filed April 22, 1992.} IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

RAMONA C. SCHRADER, ) ) HENRY CHANCERY Defendant\Appellee ) v. ) ) A. L. SCHRADER, ) Appeal No. 02A01-9605-CH-00108 ) Petitioner\Appellant )

________________________________________________________________

JUDGMENT

________________________________________________________________

This cause came on to be regularly heard and considered by this Court, and

for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion of this Court, of even date, it is

Ordered:

1. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

2. Costs of this appeal are taxed against the appellant for which execution

may issue if necessary.

ENTER:

_________________________________ Alan E. Highers, Judge

_________________________________ Holly Lillard, Judge