Ramon Valdes, in Error v. Ventura Munich Ramon Valdes, in Error v. O. M. Wood Ramon Valdes, in Error v. Maria Venega Perianes
Opinion
29 S.Ct. 692
53 L.Ed. 654
RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
VENTURA MUNICH RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error, v. O. M. WOOD RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error, v. MARIA VENEGA PERIANES
No. 457.
No. 473.
No. 474.
Supreme Court of the United States
February 1, 1909
Messrs. F. Kingsbury Curtis, John G. Carlisle, and Henry A. Stickney for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Willis Sweet for defendants in error.
Per Curiam: Writs of Error dismissed for want of jurisdictional amounts. Act of April 12, 1900, chap. 191, 31 Stat. at L. 77, §§ 34, 35; act of March 2, 1901, chap. 812, 31 Stat. at L. 953, § 3; Royal Ins. Co. v. Martin, 192 U. S. 149, 159, 48 L. ed. 385, 388, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 247; Ortega v. Lara, 202 U. S. 339, 50 L. ed. 1055, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 707; Perez v. Fernandez, 202 U. S. 80, 50 L. ed. 942, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 561; Garrozi v. Dastas, 204 U. S. 64, 73, 51 L. ed. 369, 376, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 224.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
212 U.S. 568 (Ramon Valdes, in Error v. Ventura Munich Ramon Valdes, in Error v. O. M. Wood Ramon Valdes, in Error v. Maria Venega Perianes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.