Ramon Valdes, in Error v. Ventura Munich Ramon Valdes, in Error v. O. M. Wood Ramon Valdes, in Error v. Maria Venega Perianes
This text of 212 U.S. 568 (Ramon Valdes, in Error v. Ventura Munich Ramon Valdes, in Error v. O. M. Wood Ramon Valdes, in Error v. Maria Venega Perianes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
29 S.Ct. 692
53 L.Ed. 654
RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
VENTURA MUNICH RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error, v. O. M. WOOD RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error, v. MARIA VENEGA PERIANES
No. 457.
No. 473.
No. 474.
Supreme Court of the United States
February 1, 1909
Messrs. F. Kingsbury Curtis, John G. Carlisle, and Henry A. Stickney for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Willis Sweet for defendants in error.
Per Curiam: Writs of Error dismissed for want of jurisdictional amounts. Act of April 12, 1900, chap. 191, 31 Stat. at L. 77, §§ 34, 35; act of March 2, 1901, chap. 812, 31 Stat. at L. 953, § 3; Royal Ins. Co. v. Martin, 192 U. S. 149, 159, 48 L. ed. 385, 388, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 247; Ortega v. Lara, 202 U. S. 339, 50 L. ed. 1055, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 707; Perez v. Fernandez, 202 U. S. 80, 50 L. ed. 942, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 561; Garrozi v. Dastas, 204 U. S. 64, 73, 51 L. ed. 369, 376, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 224.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 U.S. 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramon-valdes-in-error-v-ventura-munich-ramon-valdes-in-error-v-o-m-scotus-1909.