Ramon Salinas 01662146 v. Charles C. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 16, 2023·No. 13-22-00368-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-22-00368-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

RAMON SALINAS #01662146, Appellant,

v.

CHARLES C. SMITH, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Tijerina, and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña

On August 8, 2022, appellant filed a notice of appeal. On August 10, 2022, and on

September 26, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that his notice of appeal

was not in compliance with Texas Rules of Appellant Procedure 9.5(e) and 25.1(d)(4).

See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e) and 25.1(d)(4). Appellant was also advised, if the defects were

not corrected within ten days, the appeal would be dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Furthermore, on September 1, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that his

docketing statement was past due.

Appellant has failed to correct the defects in his notice of appeal and has otherwise

not responded to the notices from the clerk requiring a response or other action within the

time specified; accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution. See id. 42.3(b), (c).

L. ARON PEÑA JR. Justice

Delivered and filed on the 16th day of February, 2023.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramon Salinas 01662146 v. Charles C. Smith, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Ramon Salinas 01662146 v. Charles C. Smith (Ramon Salinas 01662146 v. Charles C. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.