Ramon Ruiz v. Public Storage

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: June 4, 2026
• Docket: 3D2025-2585
• Status: Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 4, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D25-2585 Lower Tribunal No. 25-15347-CA-01 ________________

Ramon Ruiz, Appellant,

vs.

Public Storage, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles Kenneth Johnson, Judge.

Ramon Ruiz, in proper person.

Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP, and Jeffrey R. Geldens, and Caroline A. Sand, for appellees.

Before LOGUE, GORDO and GOODEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610; Hamad v. Sarsour, 406 So. 3d

334, 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025) (“Although a trial court is afforded broad

discretion, a temporary injunction is an extraordinary remedy which should

be granted only sparingly. A party seeking an injunction must demonstrate

that (1) irreparable injury will result if relief is not granted; (2) there is no

adequate remedy at law; (3) the party has a clear legal right to relief; and (4)

entry of an injunction serves the public interest. The moving party must

furnish competent, substantial evidence satisfying each prong.”) (internal

citations omitted); Yardley v. Albu, 826 So. 2d 467, 470 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)

(“Because the entering of a temporary injunction is an extraordinary remedy,

strict compliance with the provisions of rule 1.610 is required.”).