Ramon Joel Pena v. State
This text of Ramon Joel Pena v. State (Ramon Joel Pena v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-17-00596-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
RAMON JOEL PENA, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Order Per Curiam
Appellant’s brief was originally due on March 7, 2018. On May 14, 2018, this
Court granted appellant’s second motion for extension of time and directed appellant to
file the brief on or before June 7, 2018. Counsel failed to file a brief and on July 26,
2018, this Court abated the appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure. On December 18, 2018, appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw as
counsel on grounds counsel is overwhelmed with work and has been unable to complete
the brief.
Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel
rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255
(Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the
appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with
a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of
this issue.
Accordingly, the appeal remains abated and the trial court is directed to
determine whether appellant’s court-appointed attorney should remain as appellant's
counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to new appointed counsel. If the trial
court determines that there is no reason to discharge appellant’s current appointed
attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter an order to that effect. If
the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed, the name, address, email
address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly appointed counsel shall be
included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall further cause its order to
be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or
before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
2 Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 3rd day of January, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ramon Joel Pena v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramon-joel-pena-v-state-texapp-2019.