Ramon Jesus Dorado v. Jon P. Galley Attorney General of the State of Maryland

12 F.3d 204, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36713, 1993 WL 496935
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 2, 1993
Docket93-6566
StatusUnpublished

This text of 12 F.3d 204 (Ramon Jesus Dorado v. Jon P. Galley Attorney General of the State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramon Jesus Dorado v. Jon P. Galley Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 12 F.3d 204, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36713, 1993 WL 496935 (4th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

12 F.3d 204

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ramon Jesus DORADO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Jon P. GALLEY; Attorney General of the State of Maryland,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-6566.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 1993
Decided: December 2, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Ramon Jesus Dorado, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Ramon Jesus Dorado appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dorado v. Galley, No. CA-92-3569-HAR (D. Md. Apr. 6, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 F.3d 204, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36713, 1993 WL 496935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramon-jesus-dorado-v-jon-p-galley-attorney-general-of-the-state-of-ca4-1993.