Ramon Durrell Lewis v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 30, 2006
Docket14-06-00951-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ramon Durrell Lewis v. State (Ramon Durrell Lewis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramon Durrell Lewis v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 30, 2006

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 30, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00951-CR

NO. 14-06-00952-CR

RAMON DURRELL LEWIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 179th District Court

 Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1056971 & 1069235

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to unlawful possession of a firearm in trial court cause number 1056971 (14-06-00951-CR on appeal) and trial court cause number 1069235 (14-06-00952-CR on appeal).  In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on September 28, 2006, to confinement for two years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice in each cause, with the sentences to run concurrently.  Appellant filed pro se notices of appeal.  We dismiss the appeals. 


In each cause, the trial court entered a certification of the defendant=s right to appeal in which the court certified that the defendant waived the right of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  The trial court=s certification is included in each record on appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).  Each record supports the trial court=s certification.  See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).  Moreover, in each case appellant entered a plea of guilty and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by appellant.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  In neither case does the record reflect any matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or that the trial court has given permission to appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2)(A) and (B).  Appellant therefore has no right to appeal either case.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals. 

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed November 30, 2006.

Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Frost.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ramon Durrell Lewis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramon-durrell-lewis-v-state-texapp-2006.