Ramon Donato Garcia v. Priscilla Zavala

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ramon Donato Garcia v. Priscilla Zavala

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 28, 2011·No. 13-11-00069-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00069-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

RAMON DONATO GARCIA, Appellant,

v.

PRISCILLA ZAVALA, Appellee.

On appeal from the 444th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Ramon Donato Garcia, filed an appeal from a judgment rendered against him in favor of appellee, Priscilla Zavala. On May 25, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on March 15, 2011, and that the deputy district clerk, Freddy Cardoza, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3, 42.3(b), (c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

On May 5, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that he was delinquent in remitting a $175.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter. See id. 42.3(b), (c).

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notices and has failed to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

28th day of July, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-11-00069-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

RAMON DONATO GARCIA, Appellant,

v.

PRISCILLA ZAVALA, Appellee.

On appeal from the 444th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Ramon Donato Garcia, filed an appeal from a judgment rendered against him in favor of appellee, Priscilla Zavala. On May 25, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on March 15, 2011, and that the deputy district clerk, Freddy Cardoza, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3, 42.3(b), (c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

On May 5, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that he was delinquent in remitting a $175.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter. See id. 42.3(b), (c).

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notices and has failed to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

28th day of July, 2011.

Ramon Donato Garcia v. Priscilla Zavala, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Ramon Donato Garcia v. Priscilla Zavala (Ramon Donato Garcia v. Priscilla Zavala) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.