Ramon Donato Garcia v. Priscilla Zavala
This text of Ramon Donato Garcia v. Priscilla Zavala (Ramon Donato Garcia v. Priscilla Zavala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00069-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
RAMON DONATO GARCIA, Appellant,
v.
PRISCILLA ZAVALA, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 444th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Ramon Donato Garcia, filed an appeal from a judgment rendered
against him in favor of appellee, Priscilla Zavala. On May 25, 2011, the Clerk of this
Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on
March 15, 2011, and that the deputy district clerk, Freddy Cardoza, had notified this Court
that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the
defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b), (c). Appellant was
advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this
notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.
On May 5, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that he was delinquent in
remitting a $175.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal
was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of
receipt of this letter. See id. 42.3(b), (c).
Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notices and has failed to pay the
filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 28th day of July, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ramon Donato Garcia v. Priscilla Zavala, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramon-donato-garcia-v-priscilla-zavala-texapp-2011.